"Flags are bits of colored cloth that governments use first to shrink-wrap people's brains and then as ceremonial shrouds to bury the dead," according to Arundhati Roy.
7 October was a "false flag," and I predict that Trump has another prepared to justify a forthcoming invasion in Latin America (Columbia and/or Venezuela, with the latter much more likely).
October 7 was a completely staged event. When you blow away the double layer of magic propaganda dust - one layer for the 90% and one layer for the 10% aka "false flag" - what you find is that it's not just WHO's responsible that's false it's also the WHAT of the event.
Those in power have us profiled I think you will agree. They know that ~90% or so will believe their stories while ~10% won't. They aren't content with just fooling the 90% though - at least for some of their psyops - they also want to fool the 10% that don't believe them too.
How best to do that?
The false flag!
"False flag" is a propaganda term designed for the disbeliever to think it wasn't the individual or group accused by the authorities who was responsible for the crime but they themselves.
But here's the thing: the falsity isn't just in WHO's responsible it's also in WHAT happened. What you find when you blow away the magic propaganda dust is that the alleged killing and injury didn't happen, it's all fake. 9/11 was an evacuated demolition job just as all demolition jobs are. Demolition professionals aren't going to leave behind people in buildings for a terror story ... and just as 9/11 wasn't a "false flag" per se neither is any other event referred to as a false flag, including Charlie Kirk.
"Flags are bits of colored cloth that governments use first to shrink-wrap people's brains and then as ceremonial shrouds to bury the dead," according to Arundhati Roy.
7 October was a "false flag," and I predict that Trump has another prepared to justify a forthcoming invasion in Latin America (Columbia and/or Venezuela, with the latter much more likely).
October 7 was a completely staged event. When you blow away the double layer of magic propaganda dust - one layer for the 90% and one layer for the 10% aka "false flag" - what you find is that it's not just WHO's responsible that's false it's also the WHAT of the event.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/images-of-palestinian-children-and
Morgan Chase is a must-read analyst on Gaza.
https://morganc000.substack.com/p/hell-in-a-shell
You’re wrong in your assessment of false flags. Almost every major occurrence is a false flag or a conspiracy theory, whatever you want to call it.
From the USS Liberty, to JFK, 9/11, Oklahoma City building, 10/7, Charlie Kirk, and it goes on and on.
To think Charlie Kirk wasn’t killed by the CIA/Mossad is ignoring mountains of evidence and at the same time accepting an obviously false narrative.
Those in power have us profiled I think you will agree. They know that ~90% or so will believe their stories while ~10% won't. They aren't content with just fooling the 90% though - at least for some of their psyops - they also want to fool the 10% that don't believe them too.
How best to do that?
The false flag!
"False flag" is a propaganda term designed for the disbeliever to think it wasn't the individual or group accused by the authorities who was responsible for the crime but they themselves.
But here's the thing: the falsity isn't just in WHO's responsible it's also in WHAT happened. What you find when you blow away the magic propaganda dust is that the alleged killing and injury didn't happen, it's all fake. 9/11 was an evacuated demolition job just as all demolition jobs are. Demolition professionals aren't going to leave behind people in buildings for a terror story ... and just as 9/11 wasn't a "false flag" per se neither is any other event referred to as a false flag, including Charlie Kirk.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/are-false-flags-a-thing